Skip to content

Rereading Joe Abercrombie’s First Law Trilogy, Before They Are Hanged: “The Rest is Wasted Breath” and “A Matter of Time”

9
Share

Rereading Joe Abercrombie’s First Law Trilogy, Before They Are Hanged: “The Rest is Wasted Breath” and “A Matter of Time”

Home / Joe Abercrombie First Law Trilogy Reread / Rereading Joe Abercrombie’s First Law Trilogy, Before They Are Hanged: “The Rest is Wasted Breath” and “A Matter of Time”
Rereads and Rewatches The Joe Abercrombie reread

Rereading Joe Abercrombie’s First Law Trilogy, Before They Are Hanged: “The Rest is Wasted Breath” and “A Matter of Time”

By

Published on September 5, 2014

9
Share

Good news reread fans! I have it on good authority that Joe Abercrombie would like to come join us for a reread (and otherwise) Q&A session. Does that sound good? I thought so. It would be quite embarrassing though if I was the only one asking questions, so this is my warning to you! Start preparing your questions in your mind! I am currently working with the production staff here and Mr. Abercrombie himself to find a suitable day and time, but suffice to say it will be soon.

In more immediate news, we have two chapters for your rereading pleasure. “The Gideon Smith amazon buy linkRest is Wasted Breath” features the brief reuniting of Bayaz and Zacharus from Ferro’s point of view. Meanwhile, “A Matter of Time” shows Glokta coming to grips with the soon-to-come victory of the Gurkish and his captured Eater’s proclivities.

“The Rest is Wasted Breath”

Summary: Ferro rides toward Aulcus, with Logen at her side. Despite every effort to the contrary, she’s starting to like him. He does what he says, which is something she finds incredibly rare among men. She finds it hard to reconcile that with the fact he’s dangerous and, apparently, has a death sentence in his homeland. Ferro would fight back, where Logen has learned that fighting gets you nothing but more fighting.

As they ride, a battlefield rises around them, littered with dead bodies so mangled its impossible to know who fought on which side. Appearing from nowhere, Zacharus strides toward them, claiming the dead are the work of Goltus. Here he captured his brother Scario. Even now is on his way to Darmium to end Cabrian’s mad reign. In other words, Goltus will soon be Emperor with no rivals.

Zacharus asks about Khalul, a subject that engenders no amount of vitriol from the First of the Magi. Khalul wishes to conquer. But, Khalul is to the South and Bayaz travels westward. Zacharus tries to deter Bayaz from his course. He offers to come back with Bayaz, to face Khalul at his side with Yulwei, as it was before—the Magi united. Bayaz rejects his offer and points out that the rest of the Magi cannot be reformed. It is the Seed or nothing. Zacharus fears the outcome. He hopes they fail.

Bayaz remarks hope rarely comes to anything.

Important Characters Introduced: None.

Minor Characters Introduced: Leru, Karnault, Anselmi, Brokentooth, Cawneil

Quotes to Remember:

Fighting? Hah! The better you are at it, the worse off it leaves you.

Uh, except… alive? Logen participates in his own denial. He vilifies fighting, and yet it’s entirely responsible for his continued habit of breathing. Is he saying he’d be better off dead? Well, maybe he is, but I doubt he actually believes it. Say one thing about Logen, he survives.

Silence was dull, but it was honest.

I like this line. It says so much about Ferro’s character in such a short sentence.

Analysis: Zacharus! Yay! So much delicious world building in this chapter! So many hints for the future!

First up, Malacus Quai and Zacharus’s reaction to him. The magus asks, how did Bayaz teach Quai to be quiet? It’s been quite a personality shift for the young-man. Bayaz responds that he didn’t, frowning. It’s as though Bayaz hasn’t noticed the change(s) in Quai until another points it out. Odd that.

During Bayaz’s chat with Zacharus it becomes very clear that, even though they never mention it by name, Zacharus knows exactly why they’re traveling to Aulcus. He knows and he doesn’t like it. In offering to take the place of the Seed, Zacharus demonstrates his fear of what Bayaz might do to the world if he goes through with this plan. He asks if Bayaz can do, “what Glustrod, and Kanedeis, and Juvens himself could not?” What role did the Seed play in the fall of these near-gods? Has Bayaz now placed himself on the same level as his masters? It seems so.

In fact, Zacharus goes on to mention that Bayaz, who was once first apprentice, left Juvens for Kanedias to learn his secrets too. Such secrets included Tolomei, the Makers’ daughter, a relationship that we’ve yet to get a clear picture of.

Rejecting Zacharus’s offer, Bayaz rattles off a boatload of information. He denies that Zacharus, Yulwei, and himself would be enough to defeat Khalul and his horde of Eaters. Given how large his army has become, it seems accurate. He asks if Zacharus could produce the rest of their ranks. Cawneil is in perpetual study. Leru has been hidden for centuries. Karnault has gone across the ocean. Ansemli and Brokentooth are dead. How could the Magi ever reunite? Bayaz seeks another path. It’s a path that might destroy everyone on it, and maybe everyone else too. Does anyone else get the impression Bayaz really doesn’t give a shit?

 

“A Matter of Time”

Summary: Breaches appear in the outer walls of Dagoska. Although the defenders are able to repeal the invading force, the erosion of the trench and integrity of the defensive perimeter leaves Glokta short on options for survival. General Vissbruck makes the judgement that survival is impossible if they remain. He urges flight for all the Union nobles and merchants left in the city, the native population be damned.

The only retreat though is to the sea, where Yulwei warned that the Gurkish lay in wait. Not to mention the Arch Lector has been very clear that flight is not an option. They are to hold until they are relieved. Glokta asks Vissbruck where they should go? They would not receive a heroes’ welcome in Adua. Do they flee to far off lands like Suljuk? There is no retreat. He tells Vissbruck to prepare to withdraw to the Upper City, ceding the docks to the Gurkish and cutting off all hope of escape for the Union personnel.

Beneath the palace, Glokta observes his Practicals torturing Shickel, the captured Eater. Even under their most dedicated ministrations, Shickel doesn’t break. In fact, she feels no pain, smiling all through their destruction of her body. She doesn’t even bleed. Although the torture has done nothing to encourage Shickel to talk, she begins when Glokta arrives, choosing to tell her story.

She admits to being an Eater, forced to become one when Khalul’s priests made her eat her mother. Disgusted with herself, she can’t stop. She wishes to die, knows she deserves it. But, she keeps eating because she has to, it’s inevitable like Khalul’s will. Oddly, her self loathing does not get passed on to Khalul. Shickel believes him the voice of God.

Khalul has many Eaters. None are the same, each bestowed different gifts by consuming flesh. Some have strength and speed, others endurance beyond limit, others still the ability to take forms, or trick the eye, or use the Art as Bayaz does. The slaves captured by the Gurkish army are used to feed the Eater host, to keep them strong and create new ones. As she finishes her story, Glokta leaves and orders them to burn Shickel. If she wants to die, Glokta is happy to oblige.

Back outside, Glokta meets with Cosca. The Inquisitor acknowledges the situation they’re in and passes on the order to withdraw into the Upper City at the first sign the Lower City will fall. Cosca asks when they will be reinforced with Union troops. Glokta merely shakes his head. Cosca, much like Vissbruck, suggests withdrawal. The King’s honor won’t allow it, Glokta is saddened to say. Cosca shrugs, happy to do what Glokta asks. It’s all the same to him.

Important Characters Introduced: None.

Minor Characters Introduced: None.

Quotes to Remember:

Vitari’s shirt was soaked right through and stuck to her shoulders, furious creases cut into her face. Severard was stripped to the waist, gasping for breath, muffled through his mask, lank hair flapping with sweat. Frost was as wet as if he had stood out in the rain, fat drops running down his pale skin, jaw muscles locked and bulging. The only one in the room who showed no sign of discomfort was Shickel. The girl had an ecstatic smile across her face as Vitari ground the sizzling iron into her chest.

Doesn’t this paragraph really demonstrate how the torture of someone does more damage to the torturer than it does to the tortured? It’s kind of an absurd notion, but it seems to me that even when the victim feels no pain and suffers no lasting damage (assuming she can find a flesh snack), the torturers are exhausted, drained, and wounded. Interesting that.

‘Honour, eh? What the hell is that anyway? Every man thinks it’s something different. You can’t drink it. You can’t fuck it. The more of it you have the less good it does you, and if you’ve got none at all you don’t miss it.’ He shook is head. ‘But some men think it’s the best thing in the world.’

Classic Cosca. It’s, frankly, a bit of a boring quote, insofar as it’s an often repeated axiom in the anti-hero mythos. But, I think it’s well spoken here and speaks to a lot of the sentiments that Abercrombie’s characters embody. Honor, on its own, is as ephemeral and worthless as a pile of rabbit droppings.

Analysis: Most of what’s worth discussing is stated pretty explicitly in the summary. We learn a lot about the Eaters, how they’re made and how their power manifests. I remember speculating some time ago about the difference in power between Yulwei and Bayaz. Odd, isn’t it? Is it possible that the Art itself manifests differently or is the fact that Yulwei is capable of things Bayaz is not implying he has eaten? His powers seem more similar to what we’ve seen from Eaters than what we’ve seen from Bayaz. There’s several explanations here that are possible.

As for the nature of Eaters, I presume there must be some inherent ability to touch the other side required before the consumption of human flesh imbues power. It’s not stated, but it seems reasonable. Without that caveat we’d have random cannibals running around kicking ass. I mean, maybe.

The most interesting discussion going on in the book right now is the back and forth about narrative. Bayaz believes Khalul is a betrayer. Khalul, via Shickel, believes the reverse. She sees Bayaz as a murderer of Juvens, and Khalul as the avenger. Zacharus seems to see it his own way, condoning neither behavior, but seeing Bayaz in the superior moral position, relatively speaking. The truth, insofar as anything of historical record can ever be true, is a complete mystery. Was Juvens betrayed? Were Bayaz and the other Magi right to execute that betrayal? Or was Khalul justified in his response, even in breaking the second law?

Next week: Bayaz’s crew goes all Lethal Weapon and starts showing off their scars. And a certain annoying someone gets what’s coming to him.


Justin Landon runs Staffer’s Book Review, where his posts are less on-color. Find him on Twitter for meanderings on science fiction and fantasy, and to argue with him about whatever you just read.

About the Author

Justin Landon

Author

Justin Landon runs Staffer’s Book Review, where his posts are less on-color. Find him on Twitter for meanderings on science fiction and fantasy, and to argue with him about whatever you just read.
Learn More About Justin
Subscribe
Notify of
Avatar


9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
DemetriosX
10 years ago

There’s a heck of a lot of backstory and exposition going on in these two chapters. Knowing what we do from later on, it’s easy to see that Bayaz isn’t terribly trustworthy, but when you first encounter this, it isn’t difficult to put the discrepancies in the stories down to Khalul being evil. We’re conditioned to believe in and trust the wise old wizard who has come just in the nick of time to save civilization. It took me a while longer to realize that Bayaz ain’t no Gandalf. (There’s a really subtle bit in the first book that’s almost impossible to catch where Sult goes on in praise of Arch Lector Zoller, who kept the commoners in their place and ran the Inquisition with an iron fist, and several chapters later Bayaz reveals he was Zoller.)

I will say that Bayaz is probably right that it would be impossible to get the band back together. Given what we see of the Eaters in the climax, he, Zacharus, and Yulwei wouldn’t be near enough. As for the rest, they’re all just names, though the look we eventually get at Cawneil isn’t terribly encouraging. Not to mention that I don’t think any of the other mages, including Yulwei, trust Bayaz as far as they could throw him without the Art.

All that said, it really feels like we’re twiddling our thumbs here. West and his bunch are doing a lot of walking. Bayaz and company are doing a lot of walking. Glokta is doing a lot of sitting and worrying. And it’s really going to be several chapters before any hammers start to fall.

Avatar
Casejord
10 years ago

Something I’ve been wondering for a while is whether some characters later in the series (and not in the original trilogy) are sort of “second drafts” of ones from the trilogy.

Like I believe Joe himself has said something to the effect that Monza was in part created in reaction to Ferro- redoing the role of a female warrior obsessed with revenge, but this time more well-rounded and mentally balanced.

And I’ve thought that Finree reads as a much more well-adjusted Ardee.

As you might guess, I think in some ways my question relates to how female characters are presented in the original trilogy and Joe’s efforts in later books.

On another topic, Shenkt is/was King Casamir (spelling?) right? If yes, I’m curious why Bayaz made him an Eater.

Avatar
10 years ago

During my first read, I was so sure that the captured Eater Shickel had taken control of the Practicals and assumed a new appearance. Then she dies and that is that, iirc. Not that things got any better because of it, just expected that cliche and the twist never appeared. I eventually appreciated Abercrombie not using that particular trope.

And I read Cosca’s quote as him holding up a mirror to Glokta and showing him what an honor-bound life looks like, twisted, pained, doomed, with little happiness to show for it and not much of a conscience left.

Avatar
10 years ago

Great news about Joe agreeing to a Q & A.Just wanted to say how much I enjoy reading this column each week and of course the originals books!

I recently read the first 6 books in the last 6 months and wow what an amazing and thought provoking series it is!

I love the character of Bayaz.He is so not Gandalf!Maybe we will finally get a POV chapter from him in the next trilogy?Just how dark of mind is this guy?I also want to see or learn more of the other Magi, many of whom mentioned in this post.Do we have names for all 12 yet?

Will start thinking of some questions for Joe.

Avatar
Mayank Bansal
10 years ago

@2 :

How did you get the idea that Casimir is Shenkt ?

DemetriosX
10 years ago

@2/@5
I was wondering the same thing. According to the First Law wiki, he was Bayaz’s apprentice and is also known by the name Cas, both of which I totally missed when I read BSC. I suppose if you mix those with his refusal to kneel, you could get King Casimir out of it. Personally, I thought he was a Kantic who managed to escape from Khalul.

Avatar
Skyweir
10 years ago

I think it is mentioned in the Blade Itself that Khalul’s priests are searching all the South for those with potential, which indicates that there is a certain talent that needs to be present before Eating gives you superpowers.

I also think that the disparety in abilites among the Magi comes down to their focus of study. Byaz said he focused on mind and fire, thus making him a perfect not-Gandalf with similar powers and demenour. Khalul is not-Sauron and Zacharus is not-Radagast. I always hoped we would see not-Galadriel too, but if she is in the Magi she has not appeared yet (perhaps Leru?)

DemetriosX
10 years ago

@7
That’s a good point about Bayaz being a not-Gandalf. I’m not so sure about Zacharus as a not-Radagast, though. It’s not so obvious here, but he meddles just as much as Bayaz does. His particular plaything is the Old Empire, which he’s trying to put back together. (There are stronger indications of this in one of the standalones. Red Country, maybe? I forget.) If he succeeds, I wonder how he and Bayaz would work out the power balance between the OE and the Union.

As for a not-Galadriel, maybe Cawneil? It’s a weak parallel, but we’ll get to her eventually.

Avatar
10 years ago

Justin:

“Bayaz remarks hope rarely comes to anything.”

Close, but the actual quote is:

“‘Look around you, old friend.’ And the First of the Magi smiled as he clambered up into his saddle. ‘None of you hopes ever come to anything.'”

That is to Zacharus. Bayaz takes a certain malicious pleasure in Zacharus’ many century long failure to put the empire back together. And isn’t it strange that Zacharus would have failed, with all his power, to bring the kind of order that Khalul and Bayaz have brought to their jurisdictions? Either Zacharus is really bad at what he does, or Bayaz has been knocking over his sandcastles as he builds.

reCaptcha Error: grecaptcha is not defined